KST
D
VS
B

Deno vs Bun

2026年、最適なツールを選ぶための詳細比較

📅 最終更新: 2026年2月4日⏱️ 12 min read📊 JavaScript Runtimes

🏆 クイック判定

引き分け!どちらも素晴らしい選択です。

Bun wins on raw speed and Node.js compatibility, making it ideal as a drop-in replacement. Deno wins on security, developer tooling, and web-standards alignment.

📊 Visual Comparison

総合スコア比較

95
Deno
vs
80
Bun

カテゴリー別分析

Deno: 20%機能Bun: 10%
Deno: 90%価格Bun: 90%
Deno: 70%使いやすさBun: 70%
Deno: 75%サポートBun: 75%
Deno: 60%統合Bun: 60%

Deno ハイライト

  • Secure by default with explicit permissions
  • Native TypeScript support without configuration
  • 💰 Free

Bun ハイライト

  • Blazingly fast — fastest JS runtime in benchmarks
  • Drop-in Node.js replacement for most projects
  • 💰 Free

機能比較

FeatureDenoBun
TypeScriptNative (no config)Native (via transpiler)
SecurityPermission-based sandboxSame as Node.js
Package ManagerURL imports + npm:bun install (npm compatible)
BundlerBuilt-inBuilt-in (fast)
Test RunnerBuilt-inBuilt-in (Jest compatible)
LinterBuilt-in
FormatterBuilt-in
Node CompatibilityGrowing (node: specifier)Excellent
Web APIsfetch, WebSocket, etc.fetch, WebSocket, etc.
Edge DeployDeno DeployVia adapters
Single Executable
JSR RegistryPartial

Denoとは?

D

Deno

JavaScript Runtimes

deno.com

Deno is a secure JavaScript and TypeScript runtime created by Ryan Dahl (Node.js creator). It features built-in TypeScript support, a secure-by-default permission system, and web-standard APIs.

メリット

  • Secure by default with explicit permissions
  • Native TypeScript support without configuration
  • Web-standard APIs (fetch, Web Streams, etc.)
  • Built-in formatter, linter, and test runner
  • Deno Deploy for edge deployment
  • Growing Node.js compatibility layer

デメリット

  • Smaller ecosystem than Node.js
  • Some npm packages still have compatibility issues
  • Adoption slower than expected
  • Permission system can be verbose for scripts
  • Fewer production deployments and case studies

Bunとは?

B

Bun

JavaScript Runtimes

bun.sh

Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime, bundler, transpiler, and package manager built with Zig and JavaScriptCore. It focuses on speed and Node.js compatibility, aiming to be a drop-in Node replacement.

メリット

  • Blazingly fast — fastest JS runtime in benchmarks
  • Drop-in Node.js replacement for most projects
  • Built-in bundler, transpiler, and package manager
  • bun install is significantly faster than npm
  • Native SQLite support
  • Excellent npm and Node.js compatibility

デメリット

  • Still maturing — some edge cases in compatibility
  • Less focus on security model than Deno
  • Linux and macOS only (Windows support improving)
  • Smaller team than Deno or Node
  • Some Node.js APIs still being implemented

料金比較

Deno

Free

Free and open-source

無料プランありView detailed pricing →

Bun

Free

Free and open-source

無料プランありView detailed pricing →

📊詳細分析: Deno vs Bun

DenoとBunのどちらを選ぶかは、両ツールが現代のワークフローに魅力的な機能を提供しているため、難しい選択となることがあります。この包括的な比較では、機能や価格から実際のユースケースまで、あらゆる側面を分析し、情報に基づいた意思決定をお手伝いします。

Deno

Deno is a secure JavaScript and TypeScript runtime created by Ryan Dahl (Node.js creator). It features built-in TypeScript support, a secure-by-default permission system, and web-standard APIs.

Bun

Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime, bundler, transpiler, and package manager built with Zig and JavaScriptCore. It focuses on speed and Node.js compatibility, aiming to be a drop-in Node replacement.

🎯最適なユースケース

Denoを選ぶべき時

  • チーム向け:

    Secure by default with explicit permissions

  • 中小企業向け:

    Native TypeScript support without configuration

  • エンタープライズ向け:

    Web-standard APIs (fetch, Web Streams, etc.)

Bunを選ぶべき時

  • 個人向け:

    Blazingly fast — fastest JS runtime in benchmarks

  • 中小企業向け:

    Drop-in Node.js replacement for most projects

  • チーム向け:

    Built-in bundler, transpiler, and package manager

🔍機能の詳細分析

TypeScript

Deno:Native (no config)
Bun:Native (via transpiler)

Security

Deno:Permission-based sandbox
Bun:Same as Node.js

Package Manager

Deno:URL imports + npm:
Bun:bun install (npm compatible)

Bundler

Deno:Built-in
Bun:Built-in (fast)

Test Runner

Deno:Built-in
Bun:Built-in (Jest compatible)

Linter

Deno:Built-in
Bun:❌ No

💰価格分析

Deno

Free

Free and open-source

✅ 無料プランあり

Bun

Free

Free and open-source

✅ 無料プランあり

💡 Pro Tip

両ツールは無料トライアルまたは無料プランを提供しています。有料プランに加入する前に、実際のワークフローで両方をテストすることをお勧めします。

🏆おすすめ

広範な分析とテストの結果、私たちの見解は次のとおりです:DenoとBunはどちらも生産性を大幅に向上させる優れたツールです。最適な選択は、あなたの具体的なニーズ、ワークフロー、優先事項によって異なります。

Choose Deno if:

You want a secure-by-default runtime, prefer web-standard APIs, or value built-in developer tooling (linter, formatter, test runner).

Choose Bun if:

You want the fastest JavaScript runtime, need drop-in Node.js compatibility, or want the fastest package manager.

よくある質問

Bun is easier to switch to since it's designed as a drop-in Node.js replacement. Deno requires more changes but offers security benefits. Both are worth evaluating, but Node.js remains a solid choice.

最終結論:どちらを選ぶべき?

Denoを選ぶべき場合

You want a secure-by-default runtime, prefer web-standard APIs, or value built-in developer tooling (linter, formatter, test runner).

Bunを選ぶべき場合

You want the fastest JavaScript runtime, need drop-in Node.js compatibility, or want the fastest package manager.