Obsidian vs Logseq
2026年选择正确工具的详细比较
🏆 快速判定
平局！两者都是很好的选择。
Obsidian is better for document-oriented note-taking with maximum customization. Logseq is better for outliner-based workflows, daily journaling, and those who prefer open-source software.
📚 Explore More
📊 Visual Comparison
总体评分比较
分类细分
Obsidian 亮点
- ✅ 本地优先：数据保存在您的设备上
- ✅ 强大的双向链接和图谱可视化
- 💰 Free / $4/month (sync)
Logseq 亮点
- ✅ Completely free and open-source
- ✅ Outliner-first approach for quick capture
- 💰 Free
功能比较
| Feature | Obsidian | Logseq |
|---|---|---|
| Data Format | Markdown files | Markdown/Org-mode (outliner blocks) |
| Outliner | Via plugin | Core feature |
| Backlinks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graph View | ✓ | ✓ |
| Daily Notes | ✓ | Core feature (journal) |
| Templates | ✓ | ✓ |
| Plugins | 1,000+ | Growing ecosystem |
| Local Storage | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sync | Paid ($4/month) | Logseq Sync (beta) |
| Publish | Paid ($8/month) | Logseq Publish |
| Mobile App | ✓ | ✓ |
| PDF Annotation | Via plugin | Built-in |
什么是Obsidian？
Obsidian是一个基于本地Markdown文件的强大知识库应用。它专为个人知识管理设计，具有双向链接、图谱视图和通过插件进行广泛自定义等功能。笔记存储在本地，让您完全拥有数据。通过1000多个社区插件，Obsidian可以定制以适应几乎任何工作流程。
✅优点
- •本地优先：数据保存在您的设备上
- •强大的双向链接和图谱可视化
- •拥有1000多个选项的广泛插件生态系统
- •完全离线工作
- •Markdown文件面向未来且可移植
- •商业用途的一次性购买选项
❌缺点
- •初学者有较陡的学习曲线
- •协作需要付费的Obsidian Sync
- •没有原生数据库功能
- •移动应用不如桌面版精致
- •高级功能需要初始设置
什么是Logseq？
Logseq is a free, open-source outliner-based knowledge management tool. It combines the power of an outliner with bidirectional linking, making it ideal for networked thinking and daily journaling.
✅优点
- •Completely free and open-source
- •Outliner-first approach for quick capture
- •Excellent for daily journaling workflows
- •Built-in PDF annotation and highlighting
- •Bidirectional linking without extra setup
- •Block-level referencing and embedding
❌缺点
- •Performance issues with large graphs
- •Smaller plugin ecosystem than Obsidian
- •Org-mode and Markdown format less standard
- •Mobile apps need improvement
- •Steeper learning curve for non-outliner users
价格比较
📊深度分析: Obsidian vs Logseq
在Obsidian和Logseq之间做选择可能很困难，因为两个工具都为现代工作流程提供了吸引人的功能。在这个全面的比较中，我们将分析从功能和定价到实际用例的各个方面，帮助您做出明智的决定。
Obsidian
Obsidian是一个基于本地Markdown文件的强大知识库应用。它专为个人知识管理设计，具有双向链接、图谱视图和通过插件进行广泛自定义等功能。笔记存储在本地，让您完全拥有数据。通过1000多个社区插件，Obsidian可以定制以适应几乎任何工作流程。
Logseq
Logseq is a free, open-source outliner-based knowledge management tool. It combines the power of an outliner with bidirectional linking, making it ideal for networked thinking and daily journaling.
🎯最佳使用场景
何时选择Obsidian
- ✓适合团队:
本地优先：数据保存在您的设备上
- ✓适合小型企业:
强大的双向链接和图谱可视化
- ✓适合大企业:
拥有1000多个选项的广泛插件生态系统
何时选择Logseq
- ✓适合个人:
Completely free and open-source
- ✓适合小型企业:
Outliner-first approach for quick capture
- ✓适合团队:
Excellent for daily journaling workflows
🔍功能深入分析
Data Format
Outliner
Backlinks
Graph View
Daily Notes
Templates
💰定价分析
Obsidian
Free with paid add-ons
✅ Free tier availableLogseq
Free and open-source
✅ Free tier available💡 Pro Tip
Both tools offer free trials or tiers. We recommend testing both with your actual workflow before committing to a paid plan.
🏆我们的推荐
经过广泛的分析和测试，这是我们的看法：Obsidian和Logseq都是能够显著提高生产力的优秀工具。最佳选择取决于您的具体需求、工作流程和优先级。
Choose Obsidian if:
You prefer long-form document writing, want the largest plugin ecosystem, or need maximum customization for your workflow.
Choose Logseq if:
You prefer outliner-style note-taking, want built-in PDF annotation, prioritize daily journaling, or want a fully open-source tool.
常见问题
Partially. Both can read Markdown files from the same folder, but Logseq's outliner format adds bullet points that may look unusual in Obsidian. It's better to choose one as your primary tool.
最终结论：您应该选择哪个？
✨ 选择Obsidian，如果
You prefer long-form document writing, want the largest plugin ecosystem, or need maximum customization for your workflow.
✨ 选择Logseq，如果
You prefer outliner-style note-taking, want built-in PDF annotation, prioritize daily journaling, or want a fully open-source tool.