Jest vs Vitest
2026年选择正确工具的详细比较
🏆 快速判定
胜者: Vitest
Vitest is the recommended choice for new projects, especially those using Vite. It's faster, has native ESM/TypeScript support, and offers a Jest-compatible API for easy migration. Jest remains solid for existing projects.
📚 Explore More
📊 Visual Comparison
总体评分比较
分类细分
Jest 亮点
- ✅ Industry standard with massive adoption
- ✅ Zero-config for most projects
- 💰 Free
Vitest 亮点
- ✅ Blazing fast execution with Vite
- ✅ Native ESM and TypeScript support
- 💰 Free
功能比较
| Feature | Jest | Vitest |
|---|---|---|
| Configuration | Zero-config or jest.config | vitest.config or vite.config |
| Watch Mode | ✓ | Smart with HMR |
| Mocking | Built-in jest.mock() | Built-in vi.mock() |
| Code Coverage | Built-in (Istanbul) | Built-in (v8 or Istanbul) |
| Snapshot Testing | Built-in | Built-in |
| Parallel Execution | Worker-based | Worker threads |
| TypeScript | Via ts-jest or @swc/jest | Native (via Vite) |
| ESM Support | Experimental | Native |
| Browser Testing | Via jsdom | Vitest Browser Mode |
| IDE Integration | Excellent | Good (VS Code extension) |
什么是Jest？
Jest is the most popular JavaScript testing framework, created by Facebook. It provides a zero-config testing experience with built-in mocking, code coverage, and snapshot testing.
✅优点
- •Industry standard with massive adoption
- •Zero-config for most projects
- •Built-in mocking and assertions
- •Snapshot testing
- •Great IDE integration
- •Huge community and ecosystem
❌缺点
- •Slow for large test suites
- •ESM support still evolving
- •Heavy dependency footprint
- •Configuration can become complex
- •Watch mode less responsive than Vitest
- •Not optimized for Vite/modern tooling
什么是Vitest？
Vitest is a blazing-fast unit testing framework powered by Vite. It offers Jest-compatible APIs with native ESM support, TypeScript integration, and significantly faster execution.
✅优点
- •Blazing fast execution with Vite
- •Native ESM and TypeScript support
- •Jest-compatible API (easy migration)
- •Excellent watch mode with HMR
- •Built-in UI for test visualization
- •First-class Vite integration
❌缺点
- •Smaller community than Jest
- •Newer with less battle-testing
- •Some Jest plugins not compatible
- •Best experience requires Vite
- •Less IDE integration than Jest
- •Ecosystem still growing
价格比较
📊深度分析: Jest vs Vitest
在Jest和Vitest之间做选择可能很困难，因为两个工具都为现代工作流程提供了吸引人的功能。在这个全面的比较中，我们将分析从功能和定价到实际用例的各个方面，帮助您做出明智的决定。
Jest
Jest is the most popular JavaScript testing framework, created by Facebook. It provides a zero-config testing experience with built-in mocking, code coverage, and snapshot testing.
Vitest
Vitest is a blazing-fast unit testing framework powered by Vite. It offers Jest-compatible APIs with native ESM support, TypeScript integration, and significantly faster execution.
🎯最佳使用场景
何时选择Jest
- ✓适合团队:
Industry standard with massive adoption
- ✓适合小型企业:
Zero-config for most projects
- ✓适合大企业:
Built-in mocking and assertions
何时选择Vitest
- ✓适合个人:
Blazing fast execution with Vite
- ✓适合小型企业:
Native ESM and TypeScript support
- ✓适合团队:
Jest-compatible API (easy migration)
🔍功能深入分析
Configuration
Watch Mode
Mocking
Code Coverage
Snapshot Testing
Parallel Execution
💰定价分析
Jest
Open source
✅ Free tier availableVitest
Open source
✅ Free tier available💡 Pro Tip
Both tools offer free trials or tiers. We recommend testing both with your actual workflow before committing to a paid plan.
🏆我们的推荐
经过广泛的分析和测试，这是我们的看法：Jest和Vitest都是能够显著提高生产力的优秀工具。最佳选择取决于您的具体需求、工作流程和优先级。
Choose Jest if:
You have a large existing Jest test suite, need maximum ecosystem compatibility, or your project doesn't use Vite.
Choose Vitest if:
You're starting a new project, use Vite, want faster test execution, or need native ESM and TypeScript support.
常见问题
Very easy. Vitest is designed to be Jest-compatible. Most tests work with minimal changes — mainly replacing 'jest' with 'vi' in mock calls.
最终结论：您应该选择哪个？
✨ 选择Jest，如果
You have a large existing Jest test suite, need maximum ecosystem compatibility, or your project doesn't use Vite.
✨ 选择Vitest，如果
You're starting a new project, use Vite, want faster test execution, or need native ESM and TypeScript support.