KST
G
VS
R

GraphQL vs REST API

2026年选择正确工具的详细比较

📅 最后更新: 2026年2月4日⏱️ 12 min read📊 API Technologies

🏆 快速判定

平局!两者都是很好的选择。

GraphQL excels when clients need flexible data fetching and you have complex, interconnected data. REST is simpler, better cached, and ideal for straightforward CRUD APIs.

📊 Visual Comparison

总体评分比较

72
GraphQL
vs
72
REST API

分类细分

GraphQL: 0%功能REST API: 0%
GraphQL: 90%定价REST API: 90%
GraphQL: 70%易用性REST API: 85%
GraphQL: 75%支持REST API: 75%
GraphQL: 60%集成REST API: 60%

GraphQL 亮点

  • Clients request exactly the data they need
  • Single endpoint for all queries
  • 💰 Free

REST API 亮点

  • Simple and well-understood
  • Native HTTP caching support
  • 💰 Free

功能比较

FeatureGraphQLREST API
Data FetchingClient-specified queriesServer-defined responses
EndpointsSingle endpointMultiple resource endpoints
Type SystemStrong schemaNo standard (OpenAPI optional)
Real-timeSubscriptionsVia WebSockets (separate)
CachingComplex (normalized)HTTP caching (simple)
File UploadVia extensionsNative multipart support
DocumentationAuto-generated via introspectionOpenAPI/Swagger
VersioningNot needed (evolving schema)URL or header-based
Error HandlingPartial responses possibleHTTP status codes
ToolingApollo, Relay, GraphiQLPostman, curl, any HTTP client

什么是GraphQL?

G

GraphQL

API Technologies

graphql.org

GraphQL is a query language for APIs developed by Facebook. It allows clients to request exactly the data they need, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching common with REST APIs.

优点

  • Clients request exactly the data they need
  • Single endpoint for all queries
  • Strong type system with schema
  • Real-time subscriptions built-in
  • Excellent developer tooling (GraphiQL, Apollo)
  • Self-documenting via introspection

缺点

  • More complex to set up and maintain
  • Caching is harder than REST
  • N+1 query problem requires careful handling
  • Steeper learning curve
  • File uploads not natively supported
  • Rate limiting is more complex

什么是REST API?

R

REST API

API Technologies

restfulapi.net

REST (Representational State Transfer) is the most widely used architectural style for web APIs. It uses standard HTTP methods and is simple, stateless, and well-understood by developers.

优点

  • Simple and well-understood
  • Native HTTP caching support
  • Stateless architecture
  • Wide tooling and library support
  • Easy to debug with standard HTTP tools
  • Works naturally with CDNs

缺点

  • Over-fetching and under-fetching data
  • Multiple endpoints to maintain
  • Versioning can be challenging
  • No standard type system
  • Documentation requires separate tools
  • No built-in real-time support

价格比较

GraphQL

Free

Open source specification

提供免费版View detailed pricing →

REST API

Free

Open standard

提供免费版View detailed pricing →

📊深度分析: GraphQL vs REST API

在GraphQL和REST API之间做选择可能很困难,因为两个工具都为现代工作流程提供了吸引人的功能。在这个全面的比较中,我们将分析从功能和定价到实际用例的各个方面,帮助您做出明智的决定。

GraphQL

GraphQL is a query language for APIs developed by Facebook. It allows clients to request exactly the data they need, reducing over-fetching and under-fetching common with REST APIs.

REST API

REST (Representational State Transfer) is the most widely used architectural style for web APIs. It uses standard HTTP methods and is simple, stateless, and well-understood by developers.

🎯最佳使用场景

何时选择GraphQL

  • 适合团队:

    Clients request exactly the data they need

  • 适合小型企业:

    Single endpoint for all queries

  • 适合大企业:

    Strong type system with schema

何时选择REST API

  • 适合个人:

    Simple and well-understood

  • 适合小型企业:

    Native HTTP caching support

  • 适合团队:

    Stateless architecture

🔍功能深入分析

Data Fetching

GraphQL:Client-specified queries
REST API:Server-defined responses

Endpoints

GraphQL:Single endpoint
REST API:Multiple resource endpoints

Type System

GraphQL:Strong schema
REST API:No standard (OpenAPI optional)

Real-time

GraphQL:Subscriptions
REST API:Via WebSockets (separate)

Caching

GraphQL:Complex (normalized)
REST API:HTTP caching (simple)

File Upload

GraphQL:Via extensions
REST API:Native multipart support

💰定价分析

GraphQL

Free

Open source specification

✅ Free tier available

REST API

Free

Open standard

✅ Free tier available

💡 Pro Tip

Both tools offer free trials or tiers. We recommend testing both with your actual workflow before committing to a paid plan.

🏆我们的推荐

经过广泛的分析和测试,这是我们的看法:GraphQL和REST API都是能够显著提高生产力的优秀工具。最佳选择取决于您的具体需求、工作流程和优先级。

Choose GraphQL if:

You have complex data relationships, multiple client types (web, mobile) with different data needs, or need real-time subscriptions.

Choose REST API if:

You're building simple CRUD APIs, need strong HTTP caching, or want maximum simplicity and the widest ecosystem support.

常见问题

No. GraphQL is an alternative, not a replacement. Many companies use both: GraphQL for complex client-facing APIs and REST for simple internal services.

最终结论:您应该选择哪个?

选择GraphQL,如果

You have complex data relationships, multiple client types (web, mobile) with different data needs, or need real-time subscriptions.

选择REST API,如果

You're building simple CRUD APIs, need strong HTTP caching, or want maximum simplicity and the widest ecosystem support.