Playwright vs Cypress
2026년 올바른 도구 선택을 위한 상세 비교
🏆 빠른 결론
승자: Playwright
Playwright has emerged as the stronger choice with true cross-browser support, multi-language capabilities, and built-in parallelism. Cypress still excels in developer experience and interactive debugging.
📚 Explore More
📊 Visual Comparison
전체 점수 비교
카테고리별 분석
Playwright 하이라이트
- ✅ True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- ✅ Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- 💰 Free
Cypress 하이라이트
- ✅ Interactive test runner with time-travel
- ✅ Excellent developer experience
- 💰 Free / Cloud from $67/month
기능 비교
| Feature | Playwright | Cypress |
|---|---|---|
| Browsers | Chromium, Firefox, WebKit | Chromium, Firefox (beta), WebKit (experimental) |
| Languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C# | JavaScript, TypeScript |
| Auto-waiting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Parallel Execution | Built-in | Cypress Cloud (paid) |
| Network Interception | Full control | cy.intercept() |
| Visual Testing | Screenshot comparison | Via plugins |
| Trace Viewer | Timeline + snapshots | Time-travel debugger |
| CI Integration | All major CI platforms | All major CI platforms |
| Mobile Emulation | ✓ | Viewport only |
| Component Testing | Experimental | Built-in |
Playwright란?
Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.
✅장점
- •True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- •Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- •Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests
- •Parallel execution out of the box
- •Powerful trace viewer for debugging
- •API testing capabilities
❌단점
- •Steeper initial learning curve
- •Smaller community than Cypress
- •No interactive test runner like Cypress
- •Less beginner-friendly documentation
- •Debugging can be complex
- •Fewer third-party plugins
Cypress란?
Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.
✅장점
- •Interactive test runner with time-travel
- •Excellent developer experience
- •Real-time reloading during development
- •Automatic screenshots and videos
- •Large community and plugin ecosystem
- •Great documentation for beginners
❌단점
- •Chromium-only for most features (limited Firefox/WebKit)
- •JavaScript/TypeScript only
- •No native multi-tab support
- •Slower parallel execution (requires paid Cloud)
- •Limited iframe support
- •Cypress Cloud pricing for advanced features
가격 비교
📊심층 분석: Playwright vs Cypress
Playwright와 Cypress 중에서 선택하는 것은 두 도구 모두 현대적인 워크플로우에 매력적인 기능을 제공하기 때문에 어려울 수 있습니다. 이 종합 비교에서는 기능과 가격부터 실제 사용 사례까지 모든 측면을 분석하여 정보에 입각한 결정을 내리는 데 도움을 드립니다.
Playwright
Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.
Cypress
Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.
🎯최적의 사용 사례
Playwright을 선택해야 할 때
- ✓팀을 위해:
True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- ✓중소기업을 위해:
Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- ✓대기업을 위해:
Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests
Cypress을 선택해야 할 때
- ✓개인을 위해:
Interactive test runner with time-travel
- ✓중소기업을 위해:
Excellent developer experience
- ✓팀을 위해:
Real-time reloading during development
🔍기능 심층 분석
Browsers
Languages
Auto-waiting
Parallel Execution
Network Interception
Visual Testing
💰가격 분석
Playwright
Open source
✅ 무료 플랜 제공Cypress
Open source + Cypress Cloud
✅ 무료 플랜 제공💡 Pro Tip
두 도구 모두 무료 체험 또는 무료 플랜을 제공합니다. 유료 플랜에 가입하기 전에 실제 워크플로우에서 두 도구를 모두 테스트해보시기 바랍니다.
🏆우리의 추천
광범위한 분석과 테스트 후, 우리의 결론은 다음과 같습니다: Playwright와 Cypress 모두 생산성을 크게 향상시킬 수 있는 훌륭한 도구입니다. 최선의 선택은 여러분의 구체적인 요구 사항, 워크플로우, 우선순위에 따라 달라집니다.
Playwright을 선택하세요:
You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.
Cypress을 선택하세요:
You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.
자주 묻는 질문
Playwright is gaining significant market share, but Cypress remains popular. Many teams are migrating to Playwright for its cross-browser support and built-in features.
최종 결론: 무엇을 선택해야 할까요?
✨ Playwright을 선택하세요, 만약
You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.
✨ Cypress을 선택하세요, 만약
You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.