Playwright vs Cypress
2026年、最適なツールを選ぶための詳細比較
🏆 クイック判定
勝者: Playwright
Playwright has emerged as the stronger choice with true cross-browser support, multi-language capabilities, and built-in parallelism. Cypress still excels in developer experience and interactive debugging.
📚 Explore More
📊 Visual Comparison
総合スコア比較
カテゴリー別分析
Playwright ハイライト
- ✅ True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- ✅ Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- 💰 Free
Cypress ハイライト
- ✅ Interactive test runner with time-travel
- ✅ Excellent developer experience
- 💰 Free / Cloud from $67/month
機能比較
| Feature | Playwright | Cypress |
|---|---|---|
| Browsers | Chromium, Firefox, WebKit | Chromium, Firefox (beta), WebKit (experimental) |
| Languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C# | JavaScript, TypeScript |
| Auto-waiting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Parallel Execution | Built-in | Cypress Cloud (paid) |
| Network Interception | Full control | cy.intercept() |
| Visual Testing | Screenshot comparison | Via plugins |
| Trace Viewer | Timeline + snapshots | Time-travel debugger |
| CI Integration | All major CI platforms | All major CI platforms |
| Mobile Emulation | ✓ | Viewport only |
| Component Testing | Experimental | Built-in |
Playwrightとは？
Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.
✅メリット
- •True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- •Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- •Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests
- •Parallel execution out of the box
- •Powerful trace viewer for debugging
- •API testing capabilities
❌デメリット
- •Steeper initial learning curve
- •Smaller community than Cypress
- •No interactive test runner like Cypress
- •Less beginner-friendly documentation
- •Debugging can be complex
- •Fewer third-party plugins
Cypressとは？
Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.
✅メリット
- •Interactive test runner with time-travel
- •Excellent developer experience
- •Real-time reloading during development
- •Automatic screenshots and videos
- •Large community and plugin ecosystem
- •Great documentation for beginners
❌デメリット
- •Chromium-only for most features (limited Firefox/WebKit)
- •JavaScript/TypeScript only
- •No native multi-tab support
- •Slower parallel execution (requires paid Cloud)
- •Limited iframe support
- •Cypress Cloud pricing for advanced features
料金比較
📊詳細分析: Playwright vs Cypress
PlaywrightとCypressのどちらを選ぶかは、両ツールが現代のワークフローに魅力的な機能を提供しているため、難しい選択となることがあります。この包括的な比較では、機能や価格から実際のユースケースまで、あらゆる側面を分析し、情報に基づいた意思決定をお手伝いします。
Playwright
Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.
Cypress
Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.
🎯最適なユースケース
Playwrightを選ぶべき時
- ✓チーム向け:
True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
- ✓中小企業向け:
Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
- ✓エンタープライズ向け:
Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests
Cypressを選ぶべき時
- ✓個人向け:
Interactive test runner with time-travel
- ✓中小企業向け:
Excellent developer experience
- ✓チーム向け:
Real-time reloading during development
🔍機能の詳細分析
Browsers
Languages
Auto-waiting
Parallel Execution
Network Interception
Visual Testing
💰価格分析
Playwright
Open source
✅ 無料プランありCypress
Open source + Cypress Cloud
✅ 無料プランあり💡 Pro Tip
両ツールは無料トライアルまたは無料プランを提供しています。有料プランに加入する前に、実際のワークフローで両方をテストすることをお勧めします。
🏆おすすめ
広範な分析とテストの結果、私たちの見解は次のとおりです：PlaywrightとCypressはどちらも生産性を大幅に向上させる優れたツールです。最適な選択は、あなたの具体的なニーズ、ワークフロー、優先事項によって異なります。
Choose Playwright if:
You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.
Choose Cypress if:
You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.
よくある質問
Playwright is gaining significant market share, but Cypress remains popular. Many teams are migrating to Playwright for its cross-browser support and built-in features.
最終結論：どちらを選ぶべき？
✨ Playwrightを選ぶべき場合
You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.
✨ Cypressを選ぶべき場合
You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.