KST
P
VS
C

Playwright vs Cypress

Comparación detallada para ayudarte a elegir la herramienta correcta en 2026

📅 Última actualización: 4 de febrero de 2026⏱️ 12 min read📊 Testing

🏆 Veredicto Rápido

Ganador: Playwright

Playwright has emerged as the stronger choice with true cross-browser support, multi-language capabilities, and built-in parallelism. Cypress still excels in developer experience and interactive debugging.

📊 Visual Comparison

Comparación de Puntuación General

82
Playwright
vs
77
Cypress

Desglose por Categoría

Playwright: 20%CaracterísticasCypress: 10%
Playwright: 90%PreciosCypress: 90%
Playwright: 70%Facilidad de UsoCypress: 70%
Playwright: 75%SoporteCypress: 75%
Playwright: 60%IntegraciónCypress: 60%

Playwright Destacados

  • True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
  • Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
  • 💰 Free

Cypress Destacados

  • Interactive test runner with time-travel
  • Excellent developer experience
  • 💰 Free / Cloud from $67/month

Comparación de características

FeaturePlaywrightCypress
BrowsersChromium, Firefox, WebKitChromium, Firefox (beta), WebKit (experimental)
LanguagesJavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C#JavaScript, TypeScript
Auto-waiting
Parallel ExecutionBuilt-inCypress Cloud (paid)
Network InterceptionFull controlcy.intercept()
Visual TestingScreenshot comparisonVia plugins
Trace ViewerTimeline + snapshotsTime-travel debugger
CI IntegrationAll major CI platformsAll major CI platforms
Mobile EmulationViewport only
Component TestingExperimentalBuilt-in

¿Qué es Playwright?

P

Playwright

Testing

playwright.dev

Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.

Ventajas

  • True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)
  • Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)
  • Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests
  • Parallel execution out of the box
  • Powerful trace viewer for debugging
  • API testing capabilities

Desventajas

  • Steeper initial learning curve
  • Smaller community than Cypress
  • No interactive test runner like Cypress
  • Less beginner-friendly documentation
  • Debugging can be complex
  • Fewer third-party plugins

¿Qué es Cypress?

C

Cypress

Testing

cypress.io

Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.

Ventajas

  • Interactive test runner with time-travel
  • Excellent developer experience
  • Real-time reloading during development
  • Automatic screenshots and videos
  • Large community and plugin ecosystem
  • Great documentation for beginners

Desventajas

  • Chromium-only for most features (limited Firefox/WebKit)
  • JavaScript/TypeScript only
  • No native multi-tab support
  • Slower parallel execution (requires paid Cloud)
  • Limited iframe support
  • Cypress Cloud pricing for advanced features

Comparación de precios

Playwright

Free

Open source

Plan gratuito disponibleView detailed pricing →

Cypress

Free / Cloud from $67/month

Open source + Cypress Cloud

Plan gratuito disponibleView detailed pricing →

📊Análisis en Profundidad: Playwright vs Cypress

Elegir entre Playwright y Cypress puede ser desafiante, ya que ambas herramientas ofrecen características atractivas para flujos de trabajo modernos. En esta comparación completa, analizaremos cada aspecto para ayudarte a tomar una decisión informada.

Playwright

Playwright is a modern end-to-end testing framework by Microsoft that supports multiple browsers, languages, and platforms. It's known for its reliability, auto-waiting, and powerful trace viewer.

Cypress

Cypress is a developer-friendly end-to-end testing framework known for its interactive test runner, time-travel debugging, and exceptional developer experience for testing web applications.

🎯Mejores Casos de Uso

Cuándo elegir Playwright

  • Para Equipos:

    True cross-browser testing (Chromium, Firefox, WebKit)

  • Para Pequeñas Empresas:

    Multi-language support (JS, Python, Java, C#)

  • Para Empresas:

    Auto-waiting reduces flaky tests

Cuándo elegir Cypress

  • Para Individuos:

    Interactive test runner with time-travel

  • Para Pequeñas Empresas:

    Excellent developer experience

  • Para Equipos:

    Real-time reloading during development

🔍Análisis Profundo de Características

Browsers

Playwright:Chromium, Firefox, WebKit
Cypress:Chromium, Firefox (beta), WebKit (experimental)

Languages

Playwright:JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, C#
Cypress:JavaScript, TypeScript

Auto-waiting

Playwright:✅ Yes
Cypress:✅ Yes

Parallel Execution

Playwright:Built-in
Cypress:Cypress Cloud (paid)

Network Interception

Playwright:Full control
Cypress:cy.intercept()

Visual Testing

Playwright:Screenshot comparison
Cypress:Via plugins

💰Análisis de Precios

Playwright

Free

Open source

✅ Free tier available

Cypress

Free / Cloud from $67/month

Open source + Cypress Cloud

✅ Free tier available

💡 Pro Tip

Both tools offer free trials or tiers. We recommend testing both with your actual workflow before committing to a paid plan.

🏆Nuestra Recomendación

Después de un análisis y pruebas extensas, esta es nuestra opinión: Tanto Playwright como Cypress son excelentes herramientas que pueden mejorar significativamente tu productividad. La mejor elección depende de tus necesidades específicas.

Choose Playwright if:

You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.

Choose Cypress if:

You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.

Preguntas frecuentes

Playwright is gaining significant market share, but Cypress remains popular. Many teams are migrating to Playwright for its cross-browser support and built-in features.

Veredicto final: ¿Cuál deberías elegir?

Elige Playwright si

You need true cross-browser testing, multi-language support, built-in parallel execution, or are testing complex web applications.

Elige Cypress si

You prioritize developer experience, want interactive test development, or your team is primarily JavaScript-focused and tests mainly in Chrome.